Canon
Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L vs Sigma 105mm f/1.4 Art (R6 II vs A7 IV): Portrait Blind Test with Andrea
Andrea (@andreailieva_5) and I teamed up again, this time for a lens shootout: the Canon RF 85mm f/1.2 L on the EOS R6 Mark II against the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art on the Sony A7 IV. Our last shoot together was urban style portraits with the RF 85mm. She wore a cropped plaid shirt, a black mini skort and tall brown suede boots, with a tie and glasses added later in the day, an easy outfit for comparing texture, skin tones and color.
85mm vs 105mm is one of the most common choices for portrait lenses. The RF 85mm has the faster f/1.2 aperture, and the Sigma 105mm has the longer focal length with more background compression. I shot each pose with both cameras, one right after the other, from the same spot. With the 105mm I stepped back a little so the framing matched. To keep it fair, both cameras were set to the same 5900K white balance (Canon picture style User Def. 2, Sony Standard), every frame is wide open, and all photos are original JPEGs straight out of camera, with no edits.
Gear:
The full video is a blind test with all 48 pairs: each pair is shown without names during a 10-second countdown, then the camera, lens and settings are revealed. Below are 12 sample pairs from the shoot, a mix of half body and full length shots. Play along: guess which side is the Canon RF 85mm and which is the Sigma 105mm, then tap Reveal cameras.
Sunny Path & Crosswalk
We started in the afternoon sun on a tree-lined path and a crosswalk lined with yellow bollards. Hard sun, dappled shade and lots of leaves in the background make a busy scene, which is a good test of how each lens renders the out-of-focus trees.
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/1250s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/640s · ISO 100 · 5900K
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/1000s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/800s · ISO 100 · 5900K
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/1000s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/1000s · ISO 100 · 5900K
Bollards & Trees
Across the street the background opens up into bigger trees, with the yellow bollards repeating behind her. This is where the 105mm's compression shows: the bollards and trees look bigger and closer behind her.
A
BHalf body · Canon f/1.2 · 1/1000s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/1000s · ISO 100 · 5900K
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/800s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/1000s · ISO 100 · 5900K
Tree Road in Backlight
Next we moved to a road under big trees with the low sun behind her. Backlight brings out rim light in her hair and bright bokeh highlights through the leaves, a good test of how each lens holds contrast in backlight.
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/1000s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/1250s · ISO 100 · 5900K
A
BHalf body · Canon f/1.2 · 1/1000s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/1250s · ISO 100 · 5900K
Parking Garage
To finish we went into a parking garage, with daylight coming in from the open side and warm overhead lights. In much dimmer light, at 1/100s to 1/160s and ISO 100 to 200, you can compare skin tones, low-light color and how much the background falls off.
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/125s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/100s · ISO 100 · 5900K
A
BHalf body · Canon f/1.2 · 1/125s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/100s · ISO 100 · 5900K
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/100s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/125s · ISO 100 / 200 · 5900K
Garage with Glasses
For the last set she added glasses. The bright garage lights reflect in the lenses, a nice detail test, and the dark background makes subject separation easy to judge.
A
BHalf body · Canon f/1.2 · 1/160s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/125s · ISO 200 · 5900K
A
BFull length · Canon f/1.2 · 1/160s · Sony f/1.4 · 1/125s · ISO 200 · 5900K
Want to see all 48 pairs? The full blind test on YouTube goes through every pair with a countdown before each reveal. Keep score and let me know how many you got right in the comments.
Side by Side: What I Noticed
I measured the color and brightness of all 48 pairs (same spots, same 5900K white balance, both lenses wide open):
- Color: the Sony + Sigma files came out warmer and a little more magenta in 36 of the 48 pairs. At the same Kelvin setting, the Canon files look cooler and cleaner.
- Brightness: the Canon frames came out brighter in 36 of the 48 pairs. Part of that is the aperture, since f/1.2 lets in about half a stop more light than f/1.4.
- Framing: because I stepped back with the 105mm, Andrea is about the same size in both frames: the median difference in her face size across the pairs is about 1%.
- Bokeh: with matched framing, background blur scales with focal length divided by f-number: 85 ÷ 1.2 ≈ 71 for the Canon and 105 ÷ 1.4 = 75 for the Sigma. So despite the slower aperture, the 105mm blurs the background slightly more, and its narrower view makes background shapes look bigger and closer behind her.
Which one do you like more? Let me know in the comments on the YouTube video above, and tell me how many of the blind test pairs you guessed right.
Shop the Gear
Support
Enjoyed this post?
Every review means renting or buying gear, booking models, and scouting locations. If this helped you make a gear decision, a coffee goes straight toward the next one.
Related Posts

Canon
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 L vs Nikon Z 50mm f/1.2 S (R6 II vs Z6III): Portrait Blind Test with Mia
Canon R6 II + RF 50mm f/1.2 L vs Nikon Z6III + Z 50mm f/1.2 S, side by side at f/1.2 and 5900K: a portrait blind test with Mia in William Land Park.

Canon
Canon EOS R6 Mark II + RF 85mm F1.2 L: Urban Style Portraits with Andrea
An urban style portrait session with Andrea on the Canon EOS R6 Mark II and RF 85mm F1.2 L — Tiger Mist outfits against concrete backdrops around the city, shot wide open for creamy bokeh and muted tones.

Canon
Canon EOS R6 Mark II in 2026: Still Worth Buying Now That the R6 Mark III Is Out?
Is the Canon EOS R6 Mark II still worth buying in 2026 now that the R6 Mark III and R6 V are out? A real answer from someone who's shot 190+ videos on this body — plus what's actually rumored for the R6 Mark IV, and why new camera prices have spiked due to the 2026 memory shortage.
Newsletter
Stay in the loop
Explore





